JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 8, 2020

A- de 2020

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez

✓Claimant Edier Esteban Manco Pineda

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Incumplimiento de exigencias de especificidad y suficiencia de razones
Recurso De Suplica Contra Auto Que Rechaza Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Improcedencia por cuanto el recurso de súplica no presenta argumentos que desvirtúen las razones constitutivas del rechazo de la demanda
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica.

El rechazo de la demanda se dio porque actor, en el escrito de corrección, tampoco satisfizo los requisitos de especificidad y suficiencia en los términos dispuestos en el auto inadmisorio.

La Sala Plena de Corporación decidió negar el recurso formulado y CONFIRMAR íntegramente el auto cuestionado.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR en su integridad el Auto del nueve (9) de junio de dos mil veinte (2020), proferido por la Magistrada Sustanciadora Diana Fajardo Rivera, mediante el cual se rechazó la demanda de inconstitucionalidad presentada por el ciudadano Edier Esteban Manco Pineda contra el artículo 13 (parcial) de la Ley 797 de 2003, radicada con el número D-13735.
  2. SEGUNDO. Contra esta providencia no cabe recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.