JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 10, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Julio Gustavo Rizo Suárez Vs. Caja Nacional De Previsión Social –Cajanal- Y El Fondo De Pensiones Públicas Del Nivel Nacional –Fopep-

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Suscitado Entre El Juzgado Tercero Penal Del Circuito Especializado Con Funciones De Conocimiento De Neiva Y El Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura De Neiva. Se Resolvió Remitir El Expediente De La Referencia A La Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria Del Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura Del Huila Para Que Tramite Y Decida La Acción De Tutela De Que Se Trata.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Competencia Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria del Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura
  • Competencia de superior jerárquico común
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. REMITIR el expediente a la Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria del Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura del Huila, para que adelante la correspondiente actuacion judicial.
  2. SEGUNDO. Comuniquese al Juzgado
  3. Tercero. Penal del Circuito Especializado con Funciones de Conocimiento de Neiva, lo aqui resuelto.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.