JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 13, 2001

A- de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Jairo Emiro Velez Paternina

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corte Constitucional
  • Inaplicación del precepto constitucional
  • No puede arrogarse competencias para llenar vacíos legislativos
  • Organo aplicador de la Constitución
Sala Disciplinaria Del Consejo Superior De La Judicatura
  • Dirime conflictos de competencia entre distintas jurisdicciones
Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Conocimiento para resolverlo debe ser expreso
Estado Social De Derecho
  • Posición jurídica del individuo o del funcionario público
8 topics · 9 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se dirimió el conflicto de competencia suscitado entre el Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo del Atlántico y el Juzgado 5 Penal del Circuito de Barranquilla, en la tutela promovida por el ciudadano de la referencia contra el Juzgado 4 Penal del Circuito de Barranquilla, en el sentido de que su tramitación corresponde al citado Tribunal, al cual se remitirá el expediente para su tramitación conforme a la ley.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Dirimir el conflicto de competencia suscritado entre el Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo del Atlantico y el Juzgado 5 Penal del Circuito de Barranquilla, en la accion de tutela promovida por el ciudadano Jairo Emiro Velez Paternina contra el Juzgado 4 Penal del Circuito de Barranquilla, en el sentido de que su tramitacion corresponde al Tribunal mencionado, al cual se remitira en forma inmediata el expediente para su tramitacion conforme a la ley.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.