JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 3, 2012

A- de 2012

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub

✓Claimant Cielo Judith Amaris Mora·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Madre Cabeza De Familia
  • Presupuestos jurisprudenciales para que una mujer sea considerada como tal
  • Requisitos para demostrar esa condición
Incidente De Desacato
  • Improcedencia para el caso
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de Apertura de Incidente de Desacato presentado en contra de la Fiscalía General de la Nación.

La peticionaria aduce que la entidad accionada no dio cumplimiento a lo ordenando en la sentencia de la referencia.

Por su parte, la Fiscalía concluyó que la memorialista no se encontraba en ninguno de los eventos de especial protección señalados por la Corporación en la sentencia en mención.

Se decide NEGAR la solicitud de declaratoria de desacato impetrada por la memorialista contra la Fiscalía General de la Nación, frente al cumplimiento de la sentencia SU446/11.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto la Corte Constitucional de la Republica de Colombia,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. PRIMERO. NEGAR la solicitud de declaratoria de desacato presentada por la senora CIELO JUDITH AMARIS MORA, contra la Fiscalia General de la Nacion, frente al cumplimiento de la sentencia SU 446 de 2011.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.