JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 10, 2017

A- de 2017

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alberto Rojas Ríos

✓Claimant Julia Amparo Peña Buitrago

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica formulado en contra del auto que rechazó la demanda de la referencia, por cuanto el demandante no la corrigió dentro del término concedido en el auto de inadmisión.

La Sala Plena de la Corporación considera que el recurso no prospera y, en consecuencia, decide CONFIRMAR la providencia recurrida.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el Auto del cinco (5) de abril de dos mil diecisiete (2017), mediante el cual se rechazo la demanda de inconstitucionalidad formulada por la ciudadana Julia Amparo Pena Buitrago, contra contra los incisos 1 y 2 del articulo 132 de la Ley 1474 de 2011 "por la cual se dictan normas orientadas a fortalecer los mecanismos de prevencion, investigacion y sancion de actos de corrupcion y la efectividad del control de la gestion publica", radicada bajo la referencia D-12012.
  2. SEGUNDO. COMUNIQUESE la presente providencia a la accionante, informandole que contra esta decision no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.