JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 10, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Mauricio González Cuervo

✓Claimant Justopastor Mora Campos Vs. Grupo De Medios Del Tolima S.A.

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto Negativo De Competencia Suscitado Entre Los Juzgados Cuarto Penal Municipal, Tercero Penal Del Circuito, Primero Civil Del Circuito Y Tercero Civil Municipal De Ibagué. Se Resolvió Remitir El Expediente De La Referencia Al Juzgado Tercero Penal Del Circuito De Ibagué Para Que Decida La Acción De Tutela En Cuestión.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Competencia de Juez de Circuito cuando se interpone contra medios de comunicación y la prensa
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. Primero. Remitir, por intermedio de la Secretaria General, el expediente de la referencia al Juzgado
  2. Tercero. Penal del Circuito de Ibague, para que en ejercicio de sus competencias constitucionales y legales, y dentro de los terminos establecidos, decida la accion de tutela interpuesta por Puerta Pablo Badal contra el Grupo de Medios del Tolima S.A.
  3. Segundo. Comunicar por medio de Secretaria General, el presente auto a los juzgados
  4. Cuarto. Penal Municipal,
  5. Primero. Civil del Circuito y
  6. Tercero. Civil Municipal de Ibague con el fin de que tengan conocimiento sobre lo aqui resuelto por la Corte Constitucional. Para el efecto se remitira copia de la presente providencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.