JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 2, 2003

A- de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Gabriel Rincon Alvarez

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se remitió a la Sala Civil del Tribunal Superior de Bogotá el expediente de la acción de tutela promovida el ciudadano de la referencia contra el Juzgado 29 Civil del Circuito de Bogotá y la Fiscalía 217 Local de la misma ciudad para que tramite y decida en forma inmediata, lo anterior, en aplicación de lo dispuesto en el inciso cuarto del numeral primero, del Art. 1º, que contempla: “cuando la acción de tutela se promueva contra más de una autoridad y éstas sean de diferente nivel, el reparto se hará al juez de mayor jerarquía, de conformidad con las reglas establecidas en el presente numeral” y en armonía con lo señalado en el numeral segundo del Decreto 1382 de 2000 que dice: “cuando la acción de tutela se promueva contra un funcionario o corporación judicial, le será repartida al respectivo superior funcional del accionado”.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Remitir a la Sala Civil del Tribunal Superior de Bogota el expediente de la accion de tutela promovida por Gabriel Rincon Alvarez contra el Juzgado 29 Civil del Circuito de Bogota y la Fiscalia 217 Local de la misma ciudad, para que la tramite y decida en forma inmediata.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.