JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 26, 2023

A- de 2023

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Enrique Ibáñez Najar

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto se SUSPENDEN los términos en el expediente de la referencia, correspondiente al control de constitucionalidad del Decreto Legislativo 1273 DE 2023.

Se dispone que esta suspensión se mantenga hasta el día hábil siguiente a la fecha en que se decida sobre la constitucionalidad del Decreto Legislativo 1085 de 2023, mediante el cual se declaró el estado de emergencia económica, social y ecológica en el departamento de La Guajira, momento en que se reanudará la contabilización de términos.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. SUSPENDER los términos en el expediente RE-355, correspondiente al control de constitucionalidad del Decreto Legislativo 1273 de 2023, a partir de la fecha de esta providencia.
  2. SEGUNDO. DISPONER que esta suspensión se mantenga hasta el día hábil siguiente a la fecha en que se decida sobre la constitucionalidad del Decreto Legislativo 1085 de 2023 (RE-347), momento en que se reanudará la contabilización de términos.
  3. TERCERO. La Secretaría General de la Corte Constitucional realizará las anotaciones correspondientes en el expediente de la referencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.