JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 9, 2013

A- de 2013

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub

✓Claimant Marcela Monroy Torres·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Aclaracion Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Declaración de inexequibilidad en sentencia C-113/93
Solicitud De Adicion Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Procedencia excepcional del artículo 311 del Código de Procedimiento Civil
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de adición de la Sentencia T-443/13.

La memorialista solicita a la Sala Séptima de Revisión adicionar el precitado fallo y pronunciarse sobre la existencia del requisito específico de procedibilidad de la acción de tutela contra providencias judiciales por violación de la Constitución.

La Sala consideró que la solicitud impetrada excede el ámbito de la aclaración y que se dirige a que el fallo sea modificado sustancialmente, pues realiza cuestionamientos sobre el fondo del mismo.

La Sala decide RECHAZAR la petición impetrada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. RECHAZAR, de acuerdo con las consideraciones expuestas, la solicitud de adicion de la Sentencia T-443 de 2013, formulada por la doctora Marcela Monroy Torres.
  2. SEGUNDO. COMUNICAR la presente providencia al peticionario, con la advertencia que contra esta decision no procede ningun recurso.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.