JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 24, 2002

A- de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Diana Convers Lozano

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se ordenó remitir el expediente contentivo de la tutela propuesta por la ciudadana de la referencia contra Datacredito al Juzgado 46 Civil Municipal de Bogotá para que trámite y decida en forma inmediata, toda vez que esta Corte dará aplicación a lo dispuesto por el inciso tercero del numeral primero del Art. 1º del Decreto 1382 del año 2000, según el cual a los del Jueces Municipales les serán repartidas para su conocimiento en primera instancia, las acciones de tutela que se interpongan contra “cualquier autoridad pública del orden distrital o municipal y contra los particulares”.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Corte Constitucional, en Sala Plena
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Remitase el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela propuesta por la ciudadana Diana Convers Lozano contra Datacredito al Juzgado 46 Civil Municipal de Bogota, para que la tramite y decida en forma inmediata.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.