JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 19, 2016

A- de 2016

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva

✓Claimant Carlos Alejo Barrera Arias

✓
Topic · hard data
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Aclaración De Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Declarar improcedente
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de aclaración de la sentencia T-012/16.

El magistrado del Tribunal Superior de Bogotá Carlos Alejo Barrera Arias solicitó a la Corporación aclarar y/o adicionar el fallo de la referencia, en el sentido de disponer que el plazo concedido para emitir una nueva providencia empieza a correr una vez el proceso se encuentre preparado para dictar el mismo Tras considerar que la sentencia T-012/16 es lo suficientemente clara y no conlleva a equívocos que ameriten su adición o aclaración, la Sala de Revisión decide declarar IMPROCEDENTE la petición formulada.

Se advierte al Tribunal Superior de Bogotá que las sentencias de la Corte Constitucional son de inmediato y obligatorio cumplimiento, so pena de incurrir en desacato.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. Declarar IMPROCEDENTE la solicitud de aclaracion elevada por el doctor Magistrado Carlos Alejo Vargas, relativa a la orden cuarta de la sentencia T-012 de 2016 emitida por la Sala Novena de Revision Constitucional.
  2. SEGUNDO. ADVERTIR al Tribunal Superior que las sentencias de esta Corporacion son de inmediato y obligatorio cumplimiento so pena de incurrir en desacato, de conformidad con el articulo 2591 de 1991.
  3. Contra el presente auto no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva
Reporting justice
✓
Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez
Magistrado
✓
María Victoria Calle Correa
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.