JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 25, 2003

A- de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Arquimides Reyes Garcia

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Debido Proceso
  • Imparcialidad del juez
Consejo Superior De La Judicatura Sala Disciplinaria
  • Conocimiento de la acción de tutela en Sala Plena
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se remitió el expediente de la referencia al Tribunal Superior de Cali, Sala Civil para que ejerciendo sus competencias constitucionales y legales, decida la tutela del ciudadano de la referencia contra el Consejo Superior de la Judicatura y el Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura del Valle del Cauca.

En el presente caso la Corte decide reiterar las razones expuestas en el A. 101/03 por lo que en virtud del principio de la imparcialidad de los funcionarios judiciales, ni el Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura del Valle del Cauca ni el Consejo Superior de la Judicatura pueden ser competentes para conocer el caso de la referencia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Remitir, por intermedio de Secretaria General, el expediente de la referencia al Tribunal Superior de Cali, Sala Civil, para que, ejerciendo sus competencias constitucionales y legales, decida la accion de tutela de Arquimides Reyes Garcia contra el Consejo Superior de la Judicatura y el Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura del Valle del Cauca.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.