JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 22, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Oscar Julio Rodriguez Romero

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Suplica Contra El Auto Del 30 De Julio De 2007 Que Rechazo La Demansa Presentada Contra La Resolucion No. 1311 Del 21 De Febrero De 1994, Expedida Por La Registraduria Nacional Del Estado Civil Que Impuso Una Sancion De Destitucion. El Rechazo De La Demanda Se Fundamento En Que La Corte Constitucional No Revisa Resoluciones Expedidas Por Autoridades Publicas. Existe Una Evidente Falta De Competencia De La Corte Para Conocer De Acciones Promovidas Contra Actos De La Naturaleza Señalada Por El Actor. Confirma El Auto De Rechazo De La Demanda
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corte Constitucional
  • Incompetencia sobre acto administrativo
Recurso De Suplica Contra Rechazo Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Incompetencia de la Corte Constitucional para conocer demanda contra acto administrativo
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE :
  2. CONFIRMAR el auto de fecha treinta (30) de julio de dos mil siete (2007), por medio del cual se rechazó la demanda presentada contra la Resolución No. 1311 del 21 de febrero de 1994, expedida por la Registraduría Nacional del Estado Civil, por la presunta violación de los artículos 13, 21, 29 y 87 de la Constitución.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.