JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 3, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Eduardo Rafael Bossa Argel Vs. Director Seccional Del Cuerpo Técnico De Investigación De La Fiscalía De Cartagena

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Suscitado Entre El Juzgado Quinto Penal Del Circuito De Cartagena Y El Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura De Bolivar En El Marco Del Proceso De La Referencia. Se Decidió Que, Teniendo En Cuenta La Calidad Del Accionado, Le Corresponde Adelantar La Respectiva Acción Judicial Al Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura De Bolivar.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Fiscalia General De La Nacion
  • Competencia del Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura
Accion De Tutela Contra Autoridad Publica Del Orden Nacional
  • Competencia del Tribunal Superior, Administrativo y Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura
Corte Constitucional
  • Competencia Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REMITIR el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela interpuesta por el senor Eduardo Rafael Bossa Argel contra el Cuerpo Tecnico de Investigacion de Cartagena de la Fiscalia General de la Nacion, al Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Bolivar, para que adelante la correspondiente actuacion judicial.
  2. SEGUNDO. Por Secretaria General, COMUNIQUESE al Juzgado
  3. Quinto. Penal del Circuito de Cartagena, la decision adoptada en esta providencia, con el fin de que tenga conocimiento sobre lo aqui resuelto por la Corte Constitucional en relacion con el conflicto de competencia.
  4. Comuniquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.