JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 24, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Ana Dolores Guarin De Russy Vs. Beneficencia De Cundinamarca Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Diecinueve Civil Del Circuito De Bogota Y El Tribunal Administrativo De Cundinamarca. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Tribunal Administrativo De Cundinamarca
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto Negativo De Competencia
  • Aplicación Decreto 1382/00 dentro de un proceso de acción de tutela
Accion De Tutela Contra Autoridad Publica Del Orden Nacional
  • Competencia del Tribunal Superior, Administrativo y Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura
Accion De Tutela Contra Autoridades De Diferente Nivel
  • Competencia del juez de mayor jerarquía
Accion De Tutela Contra Beneficencia De Cundinamarca
  • Competencia del Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Remitir el expediente de la referencia, por intermedio de Secretaria General, al Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca, para que ejerciendo sus competencias constitucionales y legales, decida la accion de tutela de Ana Dolores Guarin de Russy contra la Beneficencia de Cundinamarca, el Departamento de Cundinamarca y el Ministerio de Hacienda y Credito Publico.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.