JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 3, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Maria Angelica Padilla Rodriguez Vs. Ministerio De Proteccion Social -Grupo Interno De Trabajo Para La Gestion Del Pasivo Social De La Empresa Puertos De Colombia-

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto Negativo De Competencia Suscitado Entre El Tribunal Administrativo Del Magdalena Y La Sala Civil-Familia Del Tribunal Superior De Distrito Judicial De Santa Marta. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Contentivo De La Accion De Tutela Al Tribunal Administrativo Del Magdalena.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Competencia de los Tribunales y Consejos seccionales de la Judicatura
  • Competencia a prevención y libertad para escoger la especialidad del juez competente
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (2 points)
  1. Primero. REMITIR, por intermedio de Secretaria General, el expediente de la referencia al Tribunal Administrativo del Magdalena, para que ejerciendo sus competencias constitucionales y legales, resuelva la accion de tutela de Maria Angelica Padilla Rodriguez contra el Ministerio de Proteccion Social -Coordinacion General del Grupo Interno de Trabajo para la Gestion del Pasivo Social de la Empresa Puertos de Colombia.
  2. Segundo. COMUNICAR, por medio de Secretaria General, el presente auto a la Sala Civil-Familia del Tribunal Superior de Distrito Judicial de Santa Marta, con el fin de que tenga conocimiento sobre lo aqui resuelto por la Corte Constitucional. Para el efecto se remitira copia de la presente providencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.