JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 3, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Luis Eduardo Ramos Badel Vs. Procuraduría General De La Nación

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado 2 Civil Del Circuito De Sincelejo, Tribunal Administrativo De Sucre Y Tribunal Superio De Barranquilla. Se Resolvió Remitir El Expediente Contentivo De La Acción De Tutela De La Referencia Al Tribunal Administrativo De Sucre, Para Que Adelante La Correspondiente Actuación Judicial.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra La Procuraduria General De La Nacion
  • Competencia del Tribunal Administrativo elegido por el demandante ante las distintas opciones con las que contaba
Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Autoridad pública del orden nacional
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. REMITIR el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela interpuesta por el senor Luis Eduardo Ramos Badel contra la Procuraduria General de la Nacion, al Tribunal Administrativo de Sucre, para adelante la correspondiente actuacion judicial.
  2. SEGUNDO. Por Secretaria General, COMUNIQUESE al Juzgado 2 Civil del Circuito de Sincelejo y al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Barranquilla, la decision adoptada en esta providencia, con el fin de que tenga conocimiento sobre lo aqui resuelto por la Corte Constitucional en relacion con el conflicto de competencia.
  3. Comuniquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.