JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 3, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Hernan Vitoviz Mossos Vs. Central Hidroelectrica De Caldas S.A. Esp

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Suscitado Entre Los Juzgados Tercero Civil Municipal De Neiva, Tercero Promiscuo Municipal De Chinchina, Primero Penal Del Circuito De Chinchina, Tercero Administrativo De Caldas Y El Tribunal Superior Del Distrito Judicial De Manizales. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Contentivo De La Accion De Tutela A La Oficina Judicial De Neiva Para Que Sea Repartido Entre Los Juzgados Del Circuito O Con Categoria De Tales.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Competencia de juez del circuito o con categoría de tal
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. PRIMERO. Por la Secretaria General de esta Corporacion, REMITASE el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela promovida por el ciudadano Hernan Vitoviz Mossos contra la Central Hidroelectrica de Caldas S.A. S.A. "E.S.P" a la Oficina Judicial de Neiva para que el expediente sea repartido entre los juzgados del circuito o con categorias de tales.
  2. SEGUNDO. Por Secretaria General COMUNIQUESE los Juzgados
  3. Tercero. Civil Municipal de Neiva,
  4. Tercero. Promiscuo Municipal de Chinchina,
  5. Primero. Penal del Circuito de Chinchina,
  6. Tercero. Administrativo de Caldas y al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Manizales, lo resuelto en esta providencia con el fin de ponerle en conocimiento los fundamentos constitucionales y legales en virtud de los cuales se adopta la presente decision.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.