JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)February 16, 2023

A- de 2023

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Diana Constanza Fajardo Rivera

✓Claimant Carolina Ramirez Perez

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Nulidad Sentencia De Constitucionalidad
  • Rechazar por falta de carga argumentativa
  • Requisitos
Solicitud De Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Presupuestos formales y materiales de procedencia
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia C-324/22.

La peticionaria alegó tres causales por las que considera se debe declarar la nulidad del precitado fallo.

La primera, la incongruencia entre las partes considerativa y resolutiva.

La segunda, el cambio de precedente en relación con la naturaleza de la conciliación como mecanismo alternativo de solución de conflictos.

La tercera, la elusión arbitraria del análisis de asuntos de relevancia constitucional.

Luego de analizar cada uno de los cargos formulados la Sala Plena de la Corporación decidió RECHAZAR la nulidad impetrada, por incumplir el requisito de carga argumentativa y por pretender, únicamente, reabrir una discusión jurídica ya zanjada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. RECHAZAR, por falta de carga argumentativa, la solicitud de nulidad del proceso que culminó con la Sentencia C-324 de 2022, presentada por la ciudadana Carolina Ramírez Pérez.
  2. SEGUNDO. Contra la presente decisión no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.