JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 12, 2012

A- de 2012

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub

✓Claimant Max Orlando Galeano Gasca

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

4 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de Súplica interpuesto contra el auto del 1º de agosto de 2012, proferido por el magistrado Nilson Pinilla Pinilla, mediante el cual se rechazó la demanda de la referencia, por reiterar las consideraciones legales y personales expuestas en el escrito inicial. .

La Sala encuentra que el actor no hizo un uso adecuado de la presente herramienta jurídica, en orden a presentar argumentos suficientes dirigidos a desvirtuar la validez de la motivación expuesta en el auto recurrido.

Se CONFIRMA la decisión impugnada..

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el auto del
  2. primero. (01) de agosto de 2012, mediante el cual se rechazo la demanda presentada por el ciudadano Max Orlando Galeano Gasca, en contra de los articulos 1, 3, 57 y 71 de la Ley 1485 de 2011 "Por la cual se decreta el Presupuesto de Rentas y Recursos de Capital y Ley de Apropiaciones para la vigencia fiscal del 1 de enero al 31 de diciembre de 2012".
  3. SEGUNDO. ARCHIVESE el expediente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.