JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 14, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Javier Libardo Montes Paez Vs. El Registrador De Instrumentos Publicos  Zona Sur De Bogota, D.C.

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Sesenta Y Cuatro Civil Municipal De Bogota Y El Juzgado Treinta Y Tres Civil Del Circuito De Bogota, D.C. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Juzgado Treinta Y Tres Civil Del Circuito De Bogota, D.C.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Entidades Descentralizadas Por Servicios Del Orden Nacional
  • Conocimiento por jueces de circuito o con categoría de tales en primera instancia
Conflicto Negativo De Competencia Aparente
  • Aplicación Decreto 1382 de 2000
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Remitir, por intermedio de Secretaria General, el expediente de la referencia al Juzgado Treinta Tres Civil del Circuito de Bogota, DC, para que ejerciendo sus competencias constitucionales y legales, resuelva la accion de tutela de Javier Libardo Montes Paez contra el Registrador de Instrumentos Publicos, Zona Sur, de Bogota, D.C.
  2. Segundo. Comunicar, por medio de Secretaria General, el presente auto al Juzgado Sesenta y Cuatro Civil Municipal de Bogota, DC, con el fin de que tenga conocimiento sobre lo aqui resuelto por la Corte Constitucional. Para el efecto se remitira copia de la misma.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.