JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 25, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant Hernando Ramirez Arboleda

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Conocimiento Del Cumplimiento De La Sentencia T-323/05. Acatamiento De Los Fallos De Tutela Por Las Autoridades Responsables De La Vulneracion O Amenaza De Los Derechos Fundamentales. Competencia De La Corte Constitucional Para Verificar El Cumplimiento De Las Decisiones De Tutela Que Adopten Los Jueces De Instancia O, Incluso Esta, Como Maximo Tribunal De La Jurisdiccion Constitucional. En El Presente Asunto No Se Cumplen Las Circunstancias En Las Cuales La Corte Constitucional Podria Reasumir Su Competencia Para Hacer Efectiva La Orden De Tutela Y Conocer Del Cumplimiento De La Sentencia De La Referencia. Rechazada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Incidente De Desacato
  • Finalidad
Fallo De Tutela
  • Improcedencia de asumir el conocimiento del cumplimiento de la sentencia T-323 de 2005 y de revocar las decisiones proferidas por la Corte Suprema de Justicia Sala Laboral
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE
  2. RECHAZAR por improcedente la solicitud de asumir el conocimiento del cumplimiento de la sentencia T-323 de 2005 y de revocar las decisiones proferidas por la Sala Civil de la Corte Suprema de Justicia confirmada por la Sala Laboral de la Corte Suprema de Justicia dentro del tramite de tutela al que se hizo referencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto
Reporting justice
Read concurrence
✓
Jaime Araujo Rentería
Concurring opinion
Read concurrence
✓
Clara Ines Vargas Hernandez
Magistrado
Separate opinions — text available2
ConcurrenceJaime Araujo RenteríaConcurrenceHumberto Antonio Sierra Porto
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.