JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 29, 2021

A- de 2021

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Linares Cantillo

✓Claimant Maria Estela Duran Maury

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de revisión del Auto de Sala Plena 470/20, mediante el cual se rechazó el recurso de súplica presentado dentro del proceso de la referencia.

La peticionaria argumentó que con dicha providencia se le vulneran derechos fundamentales y Derechos Humanos Internacionales.

Luego de reiterar que contra el rechazo de las demandas de inconstitucionalidad únicamente procede el recurso de súplica ante la Sala Plena de la Corporación y que la petición que nuevamente se formula en esta oportunidad es manifiestamente improcedente, se decide su RECHAZO.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR, por ser manifiestamente improcedente, la solicitud presentada por la ciudadana Maria Estela Duran Maury, por las razones senaladas en el presente auto.
  2. Segundo. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.