JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 20, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Gustavo Hernández Salazar

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Reposicion Y En Subsidio El De Apelación, Contra El Auto 187 De 2005. La Sala Plena De La Corte Constitucional Considera Que Contra El Auto 187 De 2005 De Esta Corporación No Cabe Recurso De Apelación. El Recurso De Reposición Contra El Auto 187 De 2005 De Sala Plena Sí Cabe, Pero En El Presente Caso Debe Ser Negado, Pues El Recurrente No Presenta Argumentos Que Lo Sustenten Adecuadamente. Niega Y Rechaza
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. Negar el recurso de reposicion interpuesto contra el Auto 187 de 2005 por Gustavo Hernandez Salazar.
  2. Segundo. Rechazar el recurso de apelacion interpuesto contra el Auto 187 de 2005 por Gustavo Hernandez Salazar.
  3. Tercero. Rechazar la solicitud de oficiar copias a la Comision de Acusaciones de la Camara de Representantes para investigar al Procurador General de la Nacion.
  4. Cuarto. Incorporese al expediente D-5625 el original de esta providencia e insertese copia en los demas procesos que actualmente se tramiten en contra del Acto Legislativo 02 de 2004.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.