JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 25, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant William Jesus Conto Ramos Como Concesionario De Derechos Litigiosos De La Sociedad Ingenieros Consultores, Interventores, Constructores Ltda Ingos Vs. Banco Colpatria

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Quinto Civil Municipal De Barranquilla Y El Tribunal Administrativo De Atlantico. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Juzgado Quinto Civil Municipal De Barranquilla
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Remitir el expediente de la referencia, por intermedio de la Secretaria General, al Juzgado
  2. Quinto. Civil Municipal de Barranquilla, para que en ejercicio de sus competencias constitucionales y legales, tramite y decida la accion de tutela instaurada en representacion de William Jesus Conto Ramos, contra el Banco Colpatria.
  3. Informese esta decision, ademas, al Tribunal Administrativo de Atlantico.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.