JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 4, 2016

A- de 2016

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado

✓Claimant Orlando Rodriguez Ramirez

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de revisión de la sentencia C-035/16.

El Alcalde del municipio de Vetas (Santander) pidió a la Corporación suspender provisionalmente y de manera extraordinaria los efectos del precitado fallo, hasta tanto se defina de fondo la situación socio económica de los habitantes de su municipio.

Así mismo, solicitó revocar dicha providencia y, en su defecto, aceptar como derechos adquiridos las explotaciones mineras existentes.

Por no ser procedente el recurso extraordinario de revisión contra las sentencias proferidas en ejercicio del control abstracto de constitucionalidad, la Sala Plena decidió RECHAZAR el formulado en esta ocasión.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. RECHAZAR el recurso extraordinario de revision de la Sentencia C-035 de 2016, presentada por Orlando Rodriguez Ramirez, Alcalde del municipio de Vetas, Santander, el doce (12) de abril de 2016.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.