JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 3, 2020

A- de 2020

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado

✓Claimant Luz Elena Sierra Valencia Y Otro

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Suplica Contra Auto Que Rechaza Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Se confirma rechazo por haber operado el fenómeno de cosa juzgada
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica.

El rechazo de la demanda de la referenciase dio porque sobre el asunto se verificó que existía el fenómeno de la cosa juzgada constitucional.

Fundamentalmente, el Magistrado evidenció que la norma acusada ya había sido objeto de análisis en la Sentencia C-604/12, por medio de la cual se declaró exequible el numeral 4º del artículo 195 de la Ley 1437 de 2011.

La Sala Plena decidió CONFIRMAR en su integridad el auto recurrido.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el Auto del 11 de mayo de 2020, proferido por el Magistrado Antonio Jose Lizarazo Ocampo en el proceso D-13690, mediante el cual se rechazo la demanda presentada por los ciudadanos Luz Elena Sierra Valencia y Rafael Ignacio Cantillo Ortega, contra el articulo 195 (parcial) de la Ley 1437 de 2011.
  2. SEGUNDO. A traves de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional, comuniquese el contenido de esta decision a los recurrentes, indicandoles que contra esta no procede recurso alguno.
  3. TERCERO. Ejecutoriada esta decision, archivese el expediente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.