JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 15, 2003

A- de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Carlos Felipe Castrillon Muñoz

✓
Topic · hard data
Nulidad De Todo Lo Actuado. Recurso De Recusacion. Sentencia C-074/04. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Impedimento Y Recusacion
  • Consideración de las causales
  • Causales
Incidente De Recusacion
  • Identificación clara de la causal y los hechos
Recusacion
  • Deber de fundamentar la solicitud
Nulidad De Procesos De La Corte Constitucional
  • Competencia
  • Oportunidad para alegarla
4 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se denegó la solicitud de nulidad presentada por el ciudadano de la referencia en el juicio de constitucionalidad que se adelanta contra el Art. 14 transitorio de la Ley 25 de 1992, toda vez que la Sala reiteró que no ha habido vulneración alguna al debido proceso, así como no se ha configurado ninguna otra causal que pudiere significar la nulidad del juicio de inconstitucionalidad.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. DENEGAR la solicitud de nulidad presentada por el ciudadano Carlos Felipe Castrillon Munoz en el juicio de constitucionalidad que se adelanta contra el articulo 14 transitorio de la Ley 25 de 1992.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.