A- de 2012
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub
✓Claimant Luis Fernando Vega España Y Otros·Respondent Sin Información
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Termino de interposición
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de Súplica contra el auto del 14 de junio del 2012 dictado por el magistrado Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio, mediante el cual se rechazó la demanda de la referencia.
La Sala constata que los actores no interpusieron el recurso de súplica dentro del término establecido y en consecuencia procede a RECHAZARLO por extemporáneo.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. RECHAZAR por extemporaneo el recurso de suplica presentado por los ciudadanos Rubiel Timana Ordonez, Miguel Ruben Alvarez, Carlos Javier Zamudio Montilla, Efrain Rivera Munoz y Hermes Obando, contra el Auto proferido el catorce (14) de junio de dos mil doce (2012) por el Magistrado Jorge Ivan Palacio Palacio, mediante el cual se rechazo la demanda de la referencia.
- Segundo. En firme esta providencia, contra la cual no procede recurso alguno, archivese el expediente.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.