JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 16, 2001

A- de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Willian Rafael Najera Gomez

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Jueces de un mismo distrito judicial
  • Superior jerárquico común
  • Conocimiento para resolverlo debe ser expreso
Corte Constitucional
  • Inaplicación del precepto constitucional
  • No puede arrogarse competencias para llenar vacíos legislativos
  • Organo aplicador de la Constitución
Sala Disciplinaria Del Consejo Superior De La Judicatura
  • Dirime conflictos de competencia entre distintas jurisdicciones
Presidente De La Republica
  • Suspensión del decreto que establece reglas de competencia para reparto de la acción de tutela
Estado Social De Derecho
  • Posición jurídica del individuo o del funcionario público
8 topics · 11 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se ordenó remitir el expediente de la referencia a la Sala Mixta del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Barranquilla, para que defina cuál de los organismos judiciales involucrados en el conflicto negativo de que se trata es competente para conocer de la tutela incoada por el accionante contra el Juzgado Segundo Laboral del Circuito de Barranquilla.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. REMITIR el expediente de la referencia a la Sala Mixta del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Barranquilla, para que sea ella, la que defina cual de los organismos judiciales involucrados en el conflicto negativo de que se trata, es competente para conocer de la accion de tutela incoada por William Rafael Najera Gomez, contra el Juzgado
  2. Segundo. Laboral del Circuito de Barranquilla.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.