JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 18, 2007

A- de 2007

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Rosalba Vega Bello Vs. Ministerio De Ambiente, Vivienda Y Desarrollo Territorial Y Fonvivienda

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal De Pajarito (Boyaca), El Tribunal Superior Del Distrito Judicial De Yopal, El Tribunal Administrativo De Casanare, El Juzgado Primero Administrativo De Yopal Y El Juzgado Penal Del Circuito Especializado De Yopal. Ordena Al Tribunal Superior Del Distrito Judicial De Yopal Asumir El Conocimiento De La Accion De Tutela
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Competencia A Prevención En Tutela
  • Decreto 2591/91 establece reglas de competencia que difieren de las de reparto
Jurisdiccion Constitucional
  • No corresponde a quienes la ejercen determinar a priori contra quienes se dirige la acción de tutela
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. ORDENAR al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Yopal que asuma, de forma inmediata, el conocimiento de la accion de tutela de la referencia.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaria General, comuniquese al Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de Pajarito (Boyaca), el Tribunal Administrativo de Casanare, el Juzgado
  3. Primero. Administrativo de Yopal y el Juzgado Penal del Circuito Especializado de Yopal, la decision adoptada en esta providencia, con el fin de que tengan conocimiento sobre lo aqui resuelto por la Corte Constitucional en relacion con el conflicto de competencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.