JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 30, 2022

A- de 2022

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernán Leandro Correa Cardozo

✓Claimant Toscano Arevalo Francisco·Respondent Empresa De Servicios Publicos Servimompox

✓
Topic · hard data
Competencia De La Jurisdicción Ordinaria Laboral-Conflicto Originado En El Contrato De Trabajo De Trabajador Oficial
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Competencia De La Jurisdicción Ordinaria Laboral
  • Conflictos que se originen en el contrato de trabajo de trabajador oficial
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Sin información

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (7 points)
  1. PRIMERO. DIRIMIR el conflicto negativo de jurisdicción suscitado entre el Juzgado
  2. Primero. Promiscuo del Circuito Adjunto de Mompox y el Juzgado
  3. Tercero. Administrativo del Circuito de Cartagena, en el sentido de DECLARAR que corresponde al Juzgado
  4. Primero. Promiscuo del Circuito Adjunto de Mompox conocer de la demanda promovida por el señor Francisco Toscano Arévalo contra SERVIMOMPOX E.S.P.
  5. SEGUNDO. REMITIR el expediente CJU-1436 al Juzgado
  6. Primero. Promiscuo del Circuito Adjunto de Mompox para lo de su competencia, y para que comunique la presente providencia al Juzgado
  7. Tercero. Administrativo del Circuito de Cartagena y a los interesados dentro del trámite judicial correspondiente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.