JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 24, 2022

A- de 2022

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Natalia Ángel Cabo

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Seguimiento Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional En Materia De Proteccion De Comunidad Indigena
  • Adopción de medidas provisionales para superar bloqueo institucional.
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto la Sala Especial de Seguimiento a la Sentencia T-025/04 hace un requerimiento al a Unidad para las Víctimas sobre el cumplimiento de la orden primera del Auto 1442/22.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (7 points)
  1. Primero. REQUERIR, a través de la Secretaría General de esta Corporación, a la directora general de la Unidad para las Víctimas para que, en el término de los cinco (5) días siguientes a la comunicación de esta providencia, remita la información relacionada en la orden primera del auto 1442 de 2022.
  2. Para estos efectos, el documento podrá ser allegado a través del correo electrónico de la Secretaría General (salasrevisionA@corteconstitucional.gov.co).
  3. Comuníquese, notifíquese y cúmplase.
  4. NATALIA ÁNGEL CABO
  5. Presidenta
  6. Sala Especial Seguimiento Sentencia T-025 de 2004
  7. MARTHA VICTORIA SA´CHICA ME´NDEZ
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.