A- de 2019
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Cristina Pardo Schlesinger
✓Claimant Fabiola Piñacue Achicue Y Otros
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Requisitos formales y materiales de procedencia
- Negar por cuanto no existió vulneración del debido proceso y se pretende reabrir debate jurídico
- Improcedencia por falta de carga argumentativa
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia T-357/18.
La causal invocada por los peticionarios fue el desconocimiento del precedente constitucional en materia de protección de los derechos de pueblos indígenas y su efectiva incidencia en la decisión adoptada.
Teniendo en cuenta que el incidente no satisfizo el requisito formal de carga argumentativa, la Corte decidió RECHAZARLO.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. RECHAZAR la solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia T-357 del 2018, proferida por la Sala Séptima de Revisión.
- SEGUNDO. Contra este pronunciamiento no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.