JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 27, 2016

A- de 2016

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alberto Rojas Ríos

✓Claimant Nelson Fredy Rodriguez Polania

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Aclaración De Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Rechazar por extemporánea y por falta de legitimación
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de aclaración de la Sentencia C-073/10.

El peticionario le pidió a la Corporación precisar si es constitucional que los jueces de ejecución de penas y medidas de seguridad apliquen el artículo 26 de la Ley 1121 de 2006, a personas condenadas con anterioridad de la vigencia de ese compendio normativo.

La Sala Plena constata que la aclaración formulada resulta improcedente, no sólo por extemporánea sino porque el peticionario carece de legitimidad para presentarla.

Se RECHAZA.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Primero. RECHAZAR, por extemporaneidad y falta de legitimacion, la solicitud de aclaracion de la Sentencia C-073 de 2010 -expediente D-7836-, formulada por el ciudadano Nelson Fredy Rodriguez Polania.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.