A- de 2024
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Cristina Pardo Schlesinger
✓Claimant Álvarez Zuluaga José Luis Y Otra·Respondent --
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Demandante debe efectuar razonamiento mínimo para constatar yerro o arbitrariedad
- Incumplimiento de la carga argumentativa
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Recurso de súplica.
La demanda se rechazó porque los actores no presentaron corrección alguna dentro del término otorgado para el efecto.
Encontró la Sala Plena de la Corporación que los demandantes no presentaron argumentos relevantes para demostrar la existencia de errores en la providencia cuestionada y que sólo se limitaron a reiterar las explicaciones expuestas en la demanda y en la subsanación.
Ante el incumplimiento del requisito de procedibilidad relativo a la carga argumentativa se RECHAZÓ el recurso impetrado.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- PRIMERO. RECHAZAR el recurso de súplica presentado dentro del expediente de la referencia.
- SEGUNDO. Por intermedio de la Secretaría General,
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.