JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 14, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Jorge Enrique Figueroa Morantes Vs. Consejo Superior De La Judicatura Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Tribunal Superior De Antioquia Sala Civil Y El Consejo De Estado Seccion Cuarta. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Tribunal Superior De Antioquia Sala Civil-Familia-Agraria
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Desarrollo del Decreto 1382 de 2000
Accion De Tutela Contra Actuaciones Administrativas De Funcionario Judicial
  • Competencia del Tribunal Superior, Administrativo y Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura
Acción De Tutela Contra Actuaciones Administrativas
  • Competencia del Tribunal Superior, Administrativo y Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura
Accion De Tutela Contra Consejo Superior De La Judicatura Y Tribunales Administrativos
  • Competencia del Tribunal Superior
  • Proceso de selección y nombramiento de jueces administrativos
Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Asunción por Corte Constitucional cuando no existe superior jerárquico común
5 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. REMITIR el expediente de tutela al Tribunal Superior de Antioquia, Sala Civil-Familia-Agraria, para que adelante la correspondiente actuación judicial.
  2. Comuníquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.