JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 3, 2011

A- de 2011

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio

✓Claimant Miriyam Elizabeth Montaña Ramirez·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Requisitos formales y materiales de procedencia
  • Solicitud dentro de los tres días siguientes a la notificación del fallo
  • Procedencia excepcional por vulneración del debido proceso
  • No constituye oportunidad para reabrir debates jurídicos resueltos
Nulidad Sentencia De Revision De Tutela
  • Procedencia excepcional por vulneración del debido proceso y cumplimiento de la carga argumentativa de quien la alega
4 topics · 7 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud nulidad sentencia.

SU388-05 La Sala rechaza por extemporánea la solicitud de nulidad interpuesta por la memorialista, toda vez que presentó la petición alrededor de seis años después de vencido el término para hacerlo.

RECHAZADA.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. RECHAZAR POR EXTEMPORÁNEA la solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia SU-388 de 2005, presentada por la señora Miryam Elizabeth Montaña Ramírez.
  2. SEGUNDO. Contra la presente providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.