JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 9, 2001

A- de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Fernando Joaquin Gomez Agudelo

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corte Constitucional
  • Inaplicación del precepto constitucional
  • No puede arrogarse competencias para llenar vacíos legislativos
  • Organo aplicador de la Constitución
Sala Disciplinaria Del Consejo Superior De La Judicatura
  • Dirime conflictos de competencia entre distintas jurisdicciones
Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Conocimiento para resolverlo debe ser expreso
  • Jueces de una misma jurisdicción y del mismo distrito judicial
Estado Social De Derecho
  • Posición jurídica del individuo o del funcionario público
7 topics · 9 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se abstuvo de dirimir el conflicto por falta de competencia, en este caso es la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casación Laboral a quien corresponde dirimir el conflicto suscitado entre dos tribunales.

En consecuencia, se ordenó enviar el expediente a la mencionada Corte para que resuelva el trámite correspondiente.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. ABSTENERSE de dirimir el presente conflicto por falta de competencia y, en consecuencia, ORDENAR que por Secretaría General se remita a la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casación Laboral, para que esta resuelva el conflicto de competencia suscitado entre el Tribunal Superior de Bogotá, Sala Laboral, y el Tribunal Superior de Medellín, Sala Laboral.
  2. SEGUNDO. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
  3. Comuníquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.