JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 3, 2001

A- de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Zuñiga Martinez Robinson Manuel·Respondent Ejercito Nacional Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Nulidad Por Aplicación Del Decreto 1382 De 2000.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se declaró la nulidad del proceso a partir del auto proferido por el Juzgado Quinto Civil del Circuito de Barranquilla, toda vez se aplicó lo dispuesto en el numeral 1º del Art. 1º del Decreto 1382 de 2000, que es nula porque se funda en una norma manifiestamente inconstitucional.

En consecuencia, se devolvió el expediente al citado Juzgado a quién corresponde por prevención el conocimiento de este proceso, para que se tramite la tutela solicitada por el ciudadano de la referencia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. PRIMERO. Declarar la nulidad del proceso a partir del Auto proferido por el Juzgado
  2. Quinto. Civil del Circuito de Barranquilla, el 7 de septiembre de 2000.
  3. SEGUNDO. Remitir el expediente al Juzgado
  4. Primero.
  5. Quinto. Civil del Circuito de Barranquilla, a quien corresponde por prevencion el conocimiento de este proceso, para que se tramite la tutela solicitada por el senor Robinson Zuniga Martinez.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.