JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 7, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Cesar Eduardo Villafrades Galvis Vs. Fiscalia 120 De Bogota

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Segundo Penal Del Circuito De Bogota Y El Juzgado Primero Penal Del Circuito De Velez Santander. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Al Tribunal Superior De Bogota Sala Penal
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Asunción por Corte Constitucional cuando no existe superior jerárquico común
  • Competencia de la Sala Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia
  • Conocimiento directo de conflictos de competencia para garantizar derechos fundamentales
Accion De Tutela Contra Fiscalia Unidad De Patrimonio Economico De Automotores
  • Conocimiento de la Sala Penal del Tribunal Superior de Bogotá
  • No se envió al Das el informe para la corrección de antecedentes por preclusión de la acción penal por hurto
Accion De Tutela Contra Fiscalia General De La Nacion
  • Regla especial de competencia prima sobre la general
Delito
  • Competencia de jueces penales municipales y del circuito según CPP
5 topics · 8 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (23 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REMITIR el expediente de tutela al Tribunal Superior de Bogotá, Sala Penal, para que se adelante la correspondiente actuación judicial.
  2. JAIME CÓRDOBA TRIVIÑO
  3. Presidente
  4. JAIME ARAÚJO RENTERÍA
  5. Magistrado
  6. CON SALVAMENTO DE VOTO
  7. ALFREDO BELTRAN SIERRA
  8. Magistrado
  9. MANUEL JOSÉ CEPEDA ESPINOSA
  10. Magistrado
  11. RODRIGO ESCOBAR GIL
  12. Magistrado
  13. AUSENTE EN COMISION
  14. MARCO GERARDO MONROY CABRA
  15. Magistrado
  16. HUMBERTO ANTONIO SIERRA PORTO
  17. Magistrado
  18. ALVARO TAFUR GALVIS
  19. Magistrado
  20. CLARA INÉS VARGAS HERNÁNDEZ
  21. Magistrada
  22. AUSENTE EN COMISON
  23. MARTHA VICTORIA SÁCHICA MENDEZ
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.