JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 24, 2018

A- de 2018

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio José Lizarazo Ocampo

✓Claimant Jorge Armildo Sanchez Melo

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de aclaración de la Sentencia T-765/15.

Luego de revisar la petición formulada por el accionante encontró la Corte que la misma se presentó un año y seis meses después de la notificación de la providencia de la referencia.

Con base en lo anterior la Sala de Revisión dispuso RECHAZARLA por extemporánea.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. De acuerdo con las consideraciones expuestas, RECHAZAR por extemporanea la solicitud de aclaracion de la Sentencia T-765 de 2015, formulada por el senor Jorge Armildo Melo Sanchez, en su calidad de accionante.
  2. SEGUNDO. COMUNICAR la presente providencia al peticionario, con la advertencia de que contra esta decision, no procede ningun recurso.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.