JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)May 6, 2015

A- de 2015

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice María Victoria Calle Correa

✓Claimant Jose Miguel Arango Isaza Apoderado Judicial De La Sociedad Termotasajero

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Negar por cuanto se pretende reabrir debate jurídico
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia T-658/14.

El memorialista consideró que la Sala de Revisión cambió la jurisprudencia de la Sala Plena de la Corporación respecto a: 1º.

Falta de decisión de la excepción previa de pleito pendiente. 2º.

Excepción previa de pleito pendiente bajo la categoría de excepción de fondo y, 3º.

Aplicación en el tiempo de las cláusulas convencionales que consagran incrementos salariales y otros beneficios económicos.

Luego de analizar cada uno de los cargos formulados, la Sala Plena concluye que el solicitante persigue que se reabra el caso para sea estudiado otra vez lo concerniente a la interpretación de la cláusula previamente referida.

Se decide NEGAR la petición de nulidad presentada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. NEGAR la solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia T-658 de 2014 proferida por la Sala Primera de Revision de la Corte Constitucional.
  2. Segundo. Comunicar la presente providencia al peticionario, informandole que contra ella no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
María Victoria Calle Correa
Reporting justice
✓
Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo
Magistrado
✓
Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado
Magistrado
✓
Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub
Magistrado
✓
Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio
Magistrado
✓
Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva
Impedido
✓
Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez
Magistrado
✓
Martha Victoria Sáchica Méndez
Magistrado
✓
Mauricio González Cuervo
Impedido
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.