JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 15, 2021

A- de 2021

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado

✓Claimant Martha Camila Paez Y Otros

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recusacion Contra Procurador General De La Nacion En Proceso De Constitucionalidad
  • Competencia de la Sala Plena
  • Falta de legitimación para formularla
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recusación formulada en contra de la Procuradora General de la Nación.

Luego de verificar que los peticionarios no son demandantes ni intervinientes en el presente proceso y que, por consiguiente, no concretaron su interés dentro del mismo, se RECHAZA, por falta de legitimación, la recusación formulada en contra de la jefe del Ministerio Público.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. RECHAZAR, por falta de legitimacion, la recusacion formulada por Martha Camila Paez, Edison Pablo Zarate, Andres Fabian Moreno y Delio Camilo Zuniga contra la Procuradora General de la Nacion, dentro del expediente de la referencia.
  2. SEGUNDO. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.