A- de 2006
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil
✓Claimant Jairo Enrique Ruge Ramirez
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Existencia de cosa juzgada
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
See the operative part (5 points)
- Declarar EXEQUIBLE el articulo 73 de la Ley 23 de 1982."4
- En este orden de ideas, a juicio de la Sala Plena de esta Corporacion, le asiste razon al Magistrado Sustanciador para rechazar la demanda, pues esta plenamente comprobada la existencia de la cosa juzgada constitucional, en los terminos previstos en el articulo 243 del Texto Superior.
- En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de esta Corporacion,
- RESUELVE
- CONFIRMAR en su integridad el Auto de mayo tres (3) de 2006, proferido por el Magistrado Sustanciador Jaime Cordoba Trivino, mediante el cual se rechazo la demanda interpuesta por el ciudadano Jairo Enrique Ruge Ramirez.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.