JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 27, 2002

A- de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Darcio Arroyo Gomez

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Competencia de la Corte Suprema de Justicia
Corte Constitucional
  • Competencia para dirimir conflictos de competencia
Corte Suprema De Justicia
  • Competencia para dirimir conflictos entre dos despachos de la jurisdicción penal
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se declaró que la Sala Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia es competente para decidir sobre el conflicto de competencia surgido entre el Juzgado Quinto Penal del Circuito de Barranquilla y la Sala Penal del Tribunal Superior de Cali, toda vez que la Corte advierte que en este caso existe una norma aplicable, el Art. 75 numeral cuarto del Código de Procedimiento Penal (Ley 600 de 2000).

En consecuencia, se ordenó enviar el expediente a la Sala Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, para lo de su competencia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Declarar que la Sala Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia es competente para decidir sobre el conflicto de competencia surgido entre el Juzgado
  2. Quinto. Penal del Circuito de Barranquilla y la Sala Penal del Tribunal Superior de Cali.
  3. Segundo. Ordenar que por Secretaria General, se envie el expediente a la Sala Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, para lo de su competencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.