JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 23, 2009

A- de 2009

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Elena Reales Gutiérrez

✓Claimant Jose Arlet Usuga Pelaez, Heriberto Burgos Rodriguez, Ciro Antonio Amado Amado Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Incidente De Desacato De La Sentencia T-322 De 2007. En Razon De Que La Corte Carece De Competencia Para El Efecto, Se Resolvio Negar La Solicitud De La Referencia Y Dar Traslado Del Escrito A La Procuraduria General De La Nacion Y La Defensoria Del Pueblo Con El Fin De Que Verifiquen Las Denuncias Alli Contenidas Y Tomen Las Medidas Correspondientes.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Incidente De Desacato
  • Solicitud por internos de establecimiento penitenciario en sentencia T-322/07
Corte Constitucional
  • Solicitud apertura de incidente de desacato debe ser tramitada ante juez de primera instancia por falta de competencia en sentencia T-322/07
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. NEGAR la solicitud de abrir un incidente de desacato con ocasión de lo decidido y resuelto en la Sentencia T-322 de 2007.
  2. Segundo. DAR TRASLADO del escrito de los ciudadanos José Arlet Usuga Pelaez, Heriberto Burgos Rodríguez, Ciro Antonio Amado Amado, a la Procuraduría General de la Nación y a la Defensoría del Pueblo, con el fin de que verifiquen las denuncias allí contenidas y tomen las medidas que les corresponda.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.