JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 26, 2013

A- de 2013

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Ana Maria Garizao De Montiel·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Juez
  • Competente hasta que esté completamente restablecido el derecho o eliminadas las causas de la amenaza
Accion De Tutela En Materia De Agencia Oficiosa Y Derecho Al Trabajo, Salud Y Seguridad Social
  • No asumir solicitud de iniciar incidente de desacato de sentencia T-741/09
  • Competencia de juez de primera instancia para abrir incidente de desacato en sentencia T-741/09
Cumplimiento Fallo De Tutela
  • Competencia del juez de primera instancia
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Incidente de Desacato: La memorialista presentó incidente de desacato de la sentencia T-741/09y la Sala advirtió que no existe la necesidad de que la Corte directamente lo tramite.

Se decide NO ASUMIR el incidente impetrado y remitir al despacho de primera instancia, esto es, el Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de Ayapel, la petición para que determine lo que estime pertinente.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. NO ASUMIR la petición de iniciar incidente de desacato, presentada por la señora Ana María Garizao de Montiel.
  2. Segundo. REMITIR al Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de Ayapel la solicitud de abrir el incidente de desacato frente a la sentencia T-741 de 2009, para que determine lo que estime pertinente.
  3. Tercero. INFORMAR a la solicitante esta decisión, por intermedio de la Secretaría General de esta corporación.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Alberto Rojas Ríos
Magistrado
✓
Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub
Magistrado
✓
Nilson Pinilla Pinilla
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
← cites 0cited by 1 →A. 160/13SU.122/22 — Carencia Actual De Objeto Por Daño Consumado-Reglas Jurisprudenciales Relacionadas Con La Privación De La Libertad. Extensión Del Estado De · cited 57 timesSU.122/222022
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by1

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.