JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 2, 2024

A- de 2024

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimir Fernández Andrade

✓Claimant Hospital San Vicente De Paul Rionegro·Respondent Administradora De Recursos Del Sistema General De Seguridad Social Adres

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

The case-law reporter has not yet indexed topics for this decision. The summary below describes what it is about.
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Mediante Auto 394 de 2024, expediente CJU 4142, la Sala Plena resolvió un conflicto de jurisdicciones suscitado entre el Juzgado 11 Administrativo Oral de Medellín y el Juzgado 14 Laboral del Circuito de la misma ciudad.

En el segundo resolutivo se incurrió en un error al transcribir el número del expediente a remitir al Juzgado 14 Laboral del Circuito de Medellín, toda vez que se aludió al expediente CJU-3148, cuando lo adecuado era hacer referencia al proceso CJU-4142.

La Corte corrige ese error mecanográfico.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CORREGIR el numeral
  2. segundo. de la parte resolutiva del auto 394 de 2024, el cual quedará así:
  3. Segundo. REMITIR el expediente CJU-4142 al Juzgado 14 Laboral del Circuito de Medellín para que continúe con el proceso y para comunique la presente decisión a los interesados, incluyendo al Juzgado 11 Administrativo Oral del Circuito de la misma ciudad.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela