JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 22, 2011

A- de 2011

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Rafael Gilberto Colorado Rojas·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Seguro Social
  • Corregir parte resolutiva de sentencia T-576/03 por cambio en nombre del accionante
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Corrección sentencia: Con el presente auto se corrige la sentencia T-576/03, la cual quedará en todas sus partes haciendo referencia al señor Rafael Gilberto Colorado Rojas, en lugar de José Ignacio Soto Cano.

El resto de la providencia se mantiene intacta, cumpliéndose a plenitud en su verdadero sentido.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CORREGIR la sentencia T-576 de julio 16 de 2003, la cual quedará en todas sus partes haciendo referencia al señor Rafael Gilberto Colorado Rojas, en lugar de "José Ignacio Soto Cano".
  2. Segundo. MANTENER intacto el resto de la providencia corregida, que ha de cumplirse a plenitud en su verdadero sentido.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.